Responding with Dignity to Poorly Expressed Criticisms
.
While skimming my eLf ideas blogspot for some old pictures of mine that I have posted there years ago, I stumbled upon a comment posted by a netizen expressed in a not-so-positive way.
It was in 2005. It just shows that there were already detractors as early as that time. And, as usual, I responded responsibly.
Here's the comment:
lmediator@yahoo.com has a message for you about your article "A Poet to His Firstborn."
Hi there!
Its my first time to visit the website of isnare. your poetry caught my attention. I dont want tobe rude, i just thought i'd give you an unsolicited advice. your poem A Poet to His Firstborn, is not a poem. its pure prose and full of cliche's. pls be guided on your poetry basics. better yet stick on essays. I like your essays more than your poems. a friendly comment from a Palanca winner. Good day. I hope to keep in touch."
Here's my reply:
First, I am quoting from a personal letter sent to me by my best-friend Rain Paggao:
"...a writer, as a true child of knowledge, must entertain and care for impressions good or bad, not only for a counterattack (I love a warrior pen!), but also—this more than anything else—for his refinements."
Now, here's my personal response:
When do we consider a poem not a poem? When do we dismiss it as pure prose?
Answering these questions is indeed a feat, for since the advent of free verse the line dividing poetry and prose has become thin and blurry. And even though a number of formalist poets had expressed their disdain for the form—including Robert Frost (1874–1963), who said that writing free verse was like "playing tennis without a net"—there were those who became as highly regarded for embracing free verse—poets like Walt Whitman (1819–1892) and Gustave Kahn (1859–1936).
Carl Sandburg (1878–1967), a known free-verse poet, thus began his "Languages":
There are no handles upon a language
Whereby men take hold of it
And mark it with signs for its remembrance.
It is a river, this language,
Once in a thousand years
Breaking a new course
Changing its way to the ocean.
Here's the poem in question that I wrote:
A Poet to His Firstborn
Finally I found the lady
Who would be your mother and fairy
Lucky you for
She is all whom I could ever wish for
Your mother and I
Have been friends first before
We began to love each other
Or should I say,
In our hearts we have been loving each other
Long before we decided to be together
You may have come late in your parents' lives
But that's the very reason you are special
Not only to us but also to all the people
Who care about us
I promise you that
Whatever happens
We will give you everything
You will ever need
I'm sure too
That your mother will love you
As much as she loves me and as I love you
Just promise me two things:
As you grow up
Love to learn, read, and write—
For this is the key to
Understanding the world and
Accepting thy neighbors for what and who they are
And most importantly
Love and respect your mother and your siblings
As much as I respect and love them
While skimming my eLf ideas blogspot for some old pictures of mine that I have posted there years ago, I stumbled upon a comment posted by a netizen expressed in a not-so-positive way.
It was in 2005. It just shows that there were already detractors as early as that time. And, as usual, I responded responsibly.
Here's the comment:
lmediator@yahoo.com has a message for you about your article "A Poet to His Firstborn."
Hi there!
Its my first time to visit the website of isnare. your poetry caught my attention. I dont want tobe rude, i just thought i'd give you an unsolicited advice. your poem A Poet to His Firstborn, is not a poem. its pure prose and full of cliche's. pls be guided on your poetry basics. better yet stick on essays. I like your essays more than your poems. a friendly comment from a Palanca winner. Good day. I hope to keep in touch."
Here's my reply:
First, I am quoting from a personal letter sent to me by my best-friend Rain Paggao:
"...a writer, as a true child of knowledge, must entertain and care for impressions good or bad, not only for a counterattack (I love a warrior pen!), but also—this more than anything else—for his refinements."
Now, here's my personal response:
When do we consider a poem not a poem? When do we dismiss it as pure prose?
Answering these questions is indeed a feat, for since the advent of free verse the line dividing poetry and prose has become thin and blurry. And even though a number of formalist poets had expressed their disdain for the form—including Robert Frost (1874–1963), who said that writing free verse was like "playing tennis without a net"—there were those who became as highly regarded for embracing free verse—poets like Walt Whitman (1819–1892) and Gustave Kahn (1859–1936).
Carl Sandburg (1878–1967), a known free-verse poet, thus began his "Languages":
There are no handles upon a language
Whereby men take hold of it
And mark it with signs for its remembrance.
It is a river, this language,
Once in a thousand years
Breaking a new course
Changing its way to the ocean.
Here's the poem in question that I wrote:
A Poet to His Firstborn
Finally I found the lady
Who would be your mother and fairy
Lucky you for
She is all whom I could ever wish for
Your mother and I
Have been friends first before
We began to love each other
Or should I say,
In our hearts we have been loving each other
Long before we decided to be together
You may have come late in your parents' lives
But that's the very reason you are special
Not only to us but also to all the people
Who care about us
I promise you that
Whatever happens
We will give you everything
You will ever need
I'm sure too
That your mother will love you
As much as she loves me and as I love you
Just promise me two things:
As you grow up
Love to learn, read, and write—
For this is the key to
Understanding the world and
Accepting thy neighbors for what and who they are
And most importantly
Love and respect your mother and your siblings
As much as I respect and love them
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home